METHODOLOGY FOR DEVELOPING AN ENVIRONMENTAL RISK MANAGEMENT STRATEGY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25806/fm-1226Статья поступила в редакцию: 05.02.2024
Статья принята к публикации: 03.04.2024
Статья опубликована: 22.04.2024
Keywords:
Экологические риски, финансовый сектор, биоразнообразие, системные риски, риски переходного периода, финансовые риски, природный капитал.Abstract
Economic activity depends on natural capital, and there is a strong link between economic activity and the degradation of natural ecosystems. The degradation of natural ecosystems and ecosystem flows caused by economic activities is an existential problem, as ecosystem services form natural capital. The depletion of natural capital creates natural risks that have a significant impact on the financing of economic activities. The loss of biodiversity, a key element of natural capital, is increasingly seen as a potential source of financial risk. The financial sector is exposed to significant risks associated with biodiversity loss, while at the same time being uniquely positioned to accelerate positive change. Financial institutions may face financial, market, reputational and legal risks when they invest in economic activities that have adverse impacts on biodiversity or are highly dependent on natural capital. Accordingly, lending to sectors of the economy involves a certain degree of financial risk related to nature. There is a growing consensus in the financial sector that the loss of biodiversity and the degradation of ecosystem services flows is a serious systemic risk that needs to be addressed. In order to assess and mitigate the potential impact of the degradation of natural ecosystems on financial stability, the author describes the mechanisms of the impact of natural risks on the financial system and forms recommendations for assessing natural risks.
Информация о публикации
Финансирование: Исследование выполнено без привлечения внешнего финансирования, если иное не указано авторами.
Вклад авторов: Все авторы внесли существенный вклад в подготовку статьи, ознакомились с окончательной версией рукописи и одобрили ее к публикации.
Конфликт интересов: Авторы заявляют об отсутствии конфликта интересов, если иное не указано в публикации.
Правообладатель: Издательский дом «Академический».
Условия использования. Статьи текущего года распространяются по подписке на журнал «Финансовый менеджмент». Все права защищены. Полная версия статьи доступна на сайте Научной электронной библиотеки eLIBRARY.RU www.elibrary.ru/contents.asp?titleid=9552 . Материалы предыдущих лет распространяются по лицензии Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) . Метаданные всех статей распространяются по открытой лицензии и могут свободно использоваться в информационных, научных и библиографических целях.
Машиночитаемый файл метаданных: JATS XML
References
Johnson J.A., Ruta G., Baldos U., Cervigni R., Chonabayashi S., Corong E., Gavryliuk O., Gerber J., Herte, T., Nootenboom C., Polasky S., The Economic Case for Nature: A Global Earth-Economy Model to Assess Development Policy Pathways. World Bank, Washington, 2021, 183 р.
Dasgupta P. The Economics of Biodiversity: the Dasgupta Review. London: HM Treasury, 2021. 610 р.
Sustainable Insurance Forum, Nature-related Risks in the Global Insurance Sector, Washington, 2021. 87 р.
Griffin P. A., Jiang Y., Sun E. Y., Threatened by Wildfires: What do Firms Disclose in Their 10- Ks? // Journal of Business Finance & Accounting. 2022. Vol. 50. № 5-6. Р. 895-942. DOI: 10.1111/jbfa.12674.
Tager M., Double materiality: what is it and why does it matter? Commentary. London: Grantham Research Institute on Climate and the Environment // London School of Economics. 2021.
Svartzman R., Bolton P., Despres M., Pereira da Silva L. A., Samama F., Central banks, financial stability and policy coordination in the age of climate uncertainty: a three-layered analytical and operational framework // Climate Policy. 2021. Vol. 21. № 4. Р. 563-580. DOI: 10.1080/14693062.20 20.1862743.
Wurz A., Grass I., Tscharntke T., Hand Pollination of Global Crops - a Systematic Review // Basic and Applied Ecology. 2021. № 56. Р. 299-321.
WEF, BiodiverCities by 2030: Transforming Cities’ Relationship with Nature, Switzerland, 2022. 51 р.
KPM. The Time Has Come: The KPMG Survey of Sustainability Reporting, 2020. 61 р.
INSPIRE. Central Banking Toolbox - Policy Briefing no. 9. Beyond climate: addressing financial risks from nature and biodiversity loss. Beyond climate: addressing financial risks from nature and biodiversity loss - Grantham Research Institute on climate change and the environment, 2022. 18 р.
Van Toor J., D. Piljic G. Schellekens M., van Oorschot, Kok M., Indebted to Nature: Exploring Biodiversity Risks for the Dutch Financial Sector, Amsterdam, 2020. 44 р.
Lang M., Stice-Lawrence L., Textual Analysis and International Financial Reporting: Large Sample Evidence // Journal of Accounting and Economics. 2015. Vol. 60. № 2-3. Р. 110-135.
Muller R., Spengel C., Weck S., How do Investors Value the Publication of Tax Information? Evidence from the European Country-by-Country Reporting // ZEW Discussion Papers. 2021. № 21-077. Р. 50.
Power S., Dunz N., Gavryliuk O., An Overview of Nature-Related Risks and Potential Policy Actions for Ministries of Finance: Bending the Curve of Nature Loss. Coalition of Finance Ministers for Climate Action, Washington, 2022. 100 р.
