INNOVATIVE TOOLS FOR FINANCING PROJECTS FOR THE CREATION AND RESTORATION OF BLUE-GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE IN URBAN AGGLOMERATIONS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25806/fm-2484Статья поступила в редакцию: 19.01.2026
Статья принята к публикации: 04.03.2026
Статья опубликована: 06.03.2026
Keywords:
blue-green infrastructure, green infrastructure, ecosystem services, impact investments, sustainable development goals, innovative financing, urban agglomerations.Abstract
Over the past decade, an increasing number of municipal governments have been implementing initiatives to develop innovative municipal policies, the purpose of which is to achieve green urban development, which is based on the integration of natural infrastructure that generates multiple ecosystem services. Over the past nine years, the expert community and municipal authorities have noted the significant importance of blue-green infrastructure in the processes of the formation of environmentally and economically sustainable urban agglomerations. The implementation of projects for the creation and restoration of blue-green urban infrastructure is one of the urgent tasks that require the allocation of additional funding from the municipal authorities. As existing sources of financing may not be sufficient to implement full-scale blue-green infrastructure projects, mobilizing private capital is crucial. Based on a systematic review of the literature, the article presents the existing innovative financial instruments, the use of which will attract the impact of investors to finance projects for the restoration and creation of blue-green infrastructure. The article emphasizes that the integration of innovative financial instruments in the implementation of post-conflict reconstruction projects is crucial for attracting scalable private financing for reconstruction projects and the creation of blue-green infrastructure.
Информация о публикации
Финансирование: Исследование выполнено без привлечения внешнего финансирования, если иное не указано авторами.
Вклад авторов: Все авторы внесли существенный вклад в подготовку статьи, ознакомились с окончательной версией рукописи и одобрили ее к публикации.
Конфликт интересов: Авторы заявляют об отсутствии конфликта интересов, если иное не указано в публикации.
Правообладатель: Издательский дом «Академический».
Условия использования. Статьи текущего года распространяются по подписке на журнал «Финансовый менеджмент». Все права защищены. Полная версия статьи доступна на сайте Научной электронной библиотеки eLIBRARY.RU www.elibrary.ru/contents.asp?titleid=9552 . Материалы предыдущих лет распространяются по лицензии Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) . Метаданные всех статей распространяются по открытой лицензии и могут свободно использоваться в информационных, научных и библиографических целях.
Машиночитаемый файл метаданных: JATS XML
References
Jerome G., Mell I.C., Shaw D. Re-defining the characteristics of environmental volunteering: creating a typology of community-scale green infrastructure // Environmental Research 2017. № 158. P. 399-408.
Koc C.B., Osmond P., Peters A. Towards a comprehensive green infrastructure typology: a systematic review of approaches, methods and typologies // Urban Ecosystems. 2017. Vol. 20. № 1. P. 15-35.
Young R., Zanders J., Lieberknecht K. Fassman-Beck E. A comprehensive typology for mainstreaming urban green infrastructure // Journal of Hydrology. 2014. № 519. P. 2571-2583.
Deely J., Hynes S., Barquin J., Burgess D., Finney G., Silio A., Alvarez-Martinez J. M., Bailly D., Balle-Beganton J. Barrier identification framework for the implementation of blue and green infrastructures // Land Use Policy. 2020. № 99. e.105108.
Ghofrani Z., Sposito V., Faggian R. A. Comprehensive Review of Blue-Green Infrastructure Concepts // International Journal of Environment and Sustainability. 2017. № 6. P. 15-36.
Mell I., Whitten M. Access to nature in a post COVID-19 world: opportunities for green infrastructure financing, distribution and equitability in urban planning // International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021. Vol. 18. № 4. e.1527.
Oberndorfer E., Lundholm J., Bass B., Coffman R. R., Doshi H., Dunnett, N., et al. Green Roofs as Urban Ecosystems: Ecological Structures, Functions, and Services // BioScience. 2007. Vol. 57. № 10. P. 823-833.
Burkhard B., Kroll F., Nedkov S., Muller F. Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets // Ecological Indicators. 2012. № 21. P. 17-29.
Lovell S. T., Taylor J. R. Supplying urban ecosystem services through multifunctional green infrastructure in the United States // Landscape Ecology. 2013. Vol. 28. № 8. P. 1447-1463.
Andersson E., McPhearson T., Kremer P., Gomez-Baggethun E., Haase D., et al. Scale and context dependence of ecosystem service providing units // Ecosystem Services. 2014. № 12. Р. 157-164.
Kopperoinen L., Itkone P., Niemela J. Using expert knowledge in combining green infrastructure and ecosystem services in land use planning: an insight into a new place-based methodology // Landscape Ecology. 2014. Vol. 29. № 8. P. 1361-1375.
Camps-Calvet M., Langemeyer J., Calvet-Mir L., Gomez-Baggethun E. Ecosystem services provided by urban gardens in Barcelona, Spain: insights for policy and planning // Environmental Science and Policy. 2016. № 62. P. 14-23.
Dennis M., James P. Site-specific factors in the production of local urban ecosystem services: a case study of community-managed green space // Ecosystem Services. 2016. № 17. P. 208-216.
Pulighe G., Fava G., Lupia F. Insights and opportunities from mapping ecosystem services of urban green spaces and potentials in planning // Ecosystem Services. 2016. № 22. P. 1-10.
Hehenberger L., Mair J., Metz A. The assembly of a field ideology: An idea-centric perspective on systemic power in impact investing // Academy of Management Journal. 2019. № 62. P. 1672-1704.
Eisenberg M., Labrousse K., Baruah R. R., Private Market Impact Investing: A Turning Point WHITE PAPER APRIL, Geneva, 2023. 32 р.
Hochstadter A. K., Scheck B. What's in a name: An analysis of impact investing understandings by academics and practitioners // Journal of Business Ethics. 2015. № 132. P. 449-475. DOI: 10.1007/ s10551-014-2327-0.
Trelstad B. Impact investing: A brief history // Capitalism and Society, 2016. Vol. 11. № 2. P. 1-14.
Brand M.W., et al. Environmental Impact Bonds: A common framework and looking ahead // Environmental Research Infrastructure and Sustainability. 2021. № 1. e.023001.
Hall D. Greening the future: A case for environmental impact bonds // Policy Quarterly. 2017. Vol. 13. № 2. P. 43-44.
Wunder S. Revisiting the Concept of Payments for Environmental Services // Ecological Economics. 2015. Vol. 117. Р. 234-243.